ABOUT US

If Trump has his way, Amtrak’s long-run trains will roll into history

A conductor checks the tracks before the Coast Starlight departs the Amtrak station in Emeryville bound for Los Angeles. The administration’s proposed federal budget would end the L.A.-to-Seattle Starlight. Photo: Carlos Avila Gonzalez, The Chronicle
Photo: Carlos Avila Gonzalez, The Chronicle
A conductor checks the tracks before the Coast Starlight departs the Amtrak station in Emeryville bound for Los Angeles. The administration’s proposed federal budget would end the L.A.-to-Seattle Starlight.

Americans may have a short time left to take a long train ride.

The Amtrak trains that roll daily from the Bay Area to Chicago, Seattle and Los Angeles — as well as into the imaginations of the traveling public — might soon be rolling to the scrapyard instead.

Federal budget cutters once again have their eyes on long-distance Amtrak trains — the ones with bud vases in the dining car and picture windows in the lounge. If the Trump administration has its way, Amtrak will lose about half of its $1.4 billion budget and be forced next year to bump off all its long-distance runs, eliminating service to 23 states, primarily in the West and the South. Short-haul commuter lines such as the Capitol Corridor trains to Sacramento would be all that’s left.

Although Amtrak patronage was higher than ever last year, with 31.3 million passengers carried, President Trump’s budget cutters say long-distance trains carried only 15 percent of those riders.

The administration said its proposed budget for 2018 would redirect federal subsidies so Amtrak could “focus resources on the parts of the passenger rail system that provide meaningful transportation options within regions.” It said long-distance trains “have long been inefficient and incur the vast majority of Amtrak’s operating losses.”

Those operating losses totaled $227 million in fiscal 2016, Amtrak says.

Eliminating long-distance trains “would allow Amtrak to focus on better managing its state-supported and Northeast corridor train services,” the administration said. State-supported trains include California’s Capitol Corridor, San Joaquin and Pacific Surfliner lines, which are funded largely by Caltrans.

The proposed Amtrak cuts would end funding for 15 trains serving 220 cities. Gone would be the Sunset Limited (Los Angeles to New Orleans), the Lake Shore Limited (New York to Chicago) and the Empire Builder (Seattle to Chicago). Saying “Good night, America” for the last time would be the City of New Orleans, of Arlo Guthrie hit fame.

California would lose the Coast Starlight, which runs through the Bay Area twice daily on its way between Seattle and Los Angeles, and the California Zephyr, which departs every morning from Emeryville over the Sierra Nevada and the Rockies and on to Chicago.

At the Emeryville depot, passengers awaiting the departure of the diesel-powered leviathans were wailing like locomotive whistles at a grade crossing.

Trump “cuts everything people need, especially poor people,” said Walter McCain of Oakland, hunkered down in the waiting room the other morning. “Trains are a viable alternative to flying, as long as you’re not in a hurry. And there’s no need to be in a hurry. For what?”

Also not in a hurry were Mike and Marjean O’Neill of Cotati, which was a good thing because it would take them 51 hours to get to Chicago if their train left on time, which, being Amtrak, it didn’t. (The California Zephyr departed 23 minutes late, to allow the dining car crew to finish loading some chickens and the porters to take on bags of linens.)

A sleeping compartment on a train isn’t cheap, but, said Marjean O’Neill, you don’t pay extra for luggage. For their flights home from Chicago, she had calculated that the airlines would charge her $325 to carry the same five bags that Amtrak was carrying free.

“The airlines nickel and dime you for everything,” she said. “I’m tired of that crap.”

Paul Aubert of Mill Valley was heading to Los Angeles on the Coast Starlight, carrying his guitar, which he planned to play in the lounge car, and also carrying two large bottled beverages, which, he said, would surely have been confiscated if the Coast Starlight had been an airplane.

Threats to the operating budget are nothing new for Amtrak. Every year, foes say too few passengers take the long-distance trains and friends reply that the trains are more popular than ever. Every year, foes complain that trains gobble up federal transportation subsidies and friends reply that roads and airports gobble up even more.

Passengers board the Chicago-bound California Zephyr at the Amtrak Station in Emeryville, Calif., on Tuesday, June 27, 2017. Proposed federal budget calls for eliminating all long-distance Amtrak service nationwide, which would end the Coast Starlight (LA-to-Seattle) and California Zephyr (Chicago to Emeryville), both of which serve Bay Area Photo: Carlos Avila Gonzalez, The Chronicle

Photo: Carlos Avila Gonzalez, The Chronicle

Passengers board the Chicago-bound California Zephyr at the Amtrak Station in Emeryville, Calif., on Tuesday, June 27, 2017. Proposed federal budget calls for eliminating all long-distance Amtrak service nationwide, which would end the Coast Starlight (LA-to-Seattle) and California Zephyr (Chicago to Emeryville), both of which serve Bay Area

In past years, particularly in 2002 and 2016, threatened Amtrak cuts were scrapped by members of Congress who realized their states could lose long-distance trains. But “it’s more dire this time,” said Paul Dyson, president of the Rail Passenger Association of California and Nevada. “This time, the Republicans control Congress and the White House. But this is a trivial sum of money in the scheme of things.”

Jim Mathews, president of the National Association of Railroad Passengers, said long-distance trains should fit in with Trump’s promised investment in the nation’s infrastructure. Instead, he said, “this is a budget that treats small towns and rural communities as flyover country.”

The effects of a shutdown would ripple all the way down to Maryam Ettehadieh’s snack bar inside the Emeryville station. If the big trains shut down, she said, she’s shutting down too.

“I’d have to close,” she said. “The people making the decision, what do they care? They only care about money. You think the president cares about people without money?”

She stepped outside the station as veteran conductor Dennis Hogg, ticket punch holstered at his hip, watched the last of the late linens get loaded, slammed shut the door on the rearmost car and mouthed, “Train number 6, all clear” to the engineer over his walkie-talkie. Seconds later, the California Zephyr commenced its 2,438-mile meander into the heartland.

No radio frequency for CSX crew to warn Amtrak they were on DC track

WASHINGTON — Two CSX conductors struck and killed by an Amtrak train Tuesday night could not have directly warned the Amtrak engineer that they were on the tracks since CSX and Amtrak operate on different radio frequencies, a union representative said. The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating the crash, which happened around 11:30 p.m. Tuesday in the Ivy City area. The CSX freight train out of Baltimore had stopped so the crew could investigate a possible wheel problem, and the conductors apparently mistakenly stepped, without proper protections in place, from the two CSX-owned tracks closest to a Metro rail yard into the path of trains on one of the two parallel Amtrak-owned tracks closer to New York Avenue.

Amtrak Train 175, coming from Boston, struck and killed the two conductors. National Transportation Safety Board Member Earl Weener said Wednesday afternoon that it does not appear anyone else was hurt.

Herbert Harris, D.C.’s state representative for the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, said Amtrak engineers have their own radio frequency to communicate with the Union Station terminal and get other instructions along the Northeast Corridor, while CSX has a separate radio system.

“So there wouldn’t have been any interactional communication between the crews unless CSX had notified either Amtrak or possibly the tower in Union Station that they had a crew that was either on the ground or had a train with a problem, and that may very well be one of the issues that they look into: the communication with who, and what if any notification had been given,” Harris said. He represents Amtrak and commuter locomotive engineers.

Weener confirmed communication between, and with, CSX and Amtrak dispatchers is one focus of the investigations.

Communication failures contributed to a more serious Amtrak crash near Philadelphia last year that killed two Amtrak workers, but those problems with work zone protections appear to be different from potential issues tied to this crash.

Witnesses and others involved in Tuesday night’s crash are being interviewed by the NTSB. The crash stopped train service in and out of Union Station much of Wednesday morning.

While CSX and Amtrak are separate railroads, in this area the tracks are right next to each other with no barrier.

“That’s not uncommon, that you have two rail systems parallel to each other. That happens in a lot of locations, and particularly in metropolitan areas,” Harris said. “Every operating train crew … is required to be qualified on the physical territory and geography of the area that they operate in.”

One of the two CSX conductors was on the freight train learning about the layout of the tracks in the area to qualify to work on the route, Weener said.

The union has pushed for D.C. to establish and fund an independent rail safety oversight agency that would allow the District to have its own experts respond to incidents like this one, or the 2015 CSX derailment near the Rhode Island Avenue Metro station.

STATEMENT ON RAIL ACCIDENT THAT CLAIMED TWO BROTHERS

On the night of June 27, our Union tragically lost two Brothers when CSX Conductor Jake Lafave and Conductor Trainee Stephen Deal (both of Local 600) died after being struck by an Amtrak passenger train just north of Union Station in Washington D.C. On behalf of our entire membership, we extend our most heartfelt condolences to the families and friends of both men, and to their co-workers working out of Cumberland, Md.

Brother Lafave, 25, was with CSX for nearly four years. He is survived by his wife Katelyn and his parents, and we offer special thoughts for his father, CSX dispatcher Jim Lafave.

Brother Deal was 20 years old and had just over two years of CSX service. He is survived by his parents.

An investigation is underway, and SMART will join in those efforts to learn not only what caused this accident but also how to guard against similar incidents in the future.

SMART-TD Opposes An Anti-Worker Bill That Would Gut Overtime Protections

Dear Members,

Earlier this week, the House of Representatives passed an anti-worker billed misguidedly labeled as the “Working Families Flexibility Act” (H.R. 1180). This harmful legislation would let employers give workers paid time off instead of being required to pay one and a half times their regular rate of pay for hours worked beyond 40 in a work week.

H.R. 1180 encourages employers to require excessive hours because overtime work would become cheaper and allow the employer to determine when the compensatory time off is allowed. This anti-worker bill would result in longer hours, less pay and more unpredictable work schedules for those who are not fortunate enough to have a union contract to protect them.

During a time when our nation’s elected leaders should be focused on creating good paying American jobs, H.R. 1180 does nothing more than provide employers with an opportunity to cheat their employees out of their earned overtime pay.

Attached is a letter I sent to every Member of Congress urging them to vote NO on this anti-worker bill. You can find out how your elected representatives voted by clicking the link below.

In solidarity,
John Risch National Legislative Director SMART Transportation Division

Financial Impact of a Loss of 10,000 Amtrak Employees

Dear Rails: 

I received an email which should concern each and every retiree.  For those of you who belong to NARVRE here is your call to action.  This is what we signed up for.  To fellow retirees your benefits may be affected by the president's proposed elimination of railroad jobs.  Keep in mind these are American jobs, good jobs.  These are fellow Americans trying to raise families and put food on the table and roofs over their heads.  This is not partisan politics, this is Americans looking out for one another.  We each need to call our respective representatives and senators and urge them to restore the funding.  Below you can find a link to your congress men and women.  Make the call and send a message to them that railroad jobs AND our retirement benefits are off the table.  If they can steamroll this through congress then they will try to further dismantle sacred cows like RR Retirement!

If signed into law, President Trump’s 2018 budget proposal would eliminate Amtrak’s long distance train service. The immediate fall out would be significant for all American rail workers resulting in the loss of 10,000 non-Northeast Corridor Amtrak jobs by the end of this year.

According to a recent report by the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) Actuary, the impact of such job losses would result in a long-term decrease in Railroad Retirement benefits and overall increase in taxes.

Impact on RRB benefits & trust funds if 10,000 Amtrak jobs cut

While RRB accounts could absorb the loss of 10,000 Amtrak jobs, the cumulative impact of losses in the rail industry, including approximately 30,000 jobs that have been lost in just the last two years, will take a significantly negative toll on the entire system. Attached you will find the RRB’s detailed projection in loss of jobs, loss of benefits, and major increase in railroad unemployment benefits projected for 2017 and 2018.

The time to act is NOW

We must urge fellow members, friends and family to call, email and write our national elected officials  to OPPOSE any budget that would cut 10,00 Amtrak jobs, eliminate commuter rail service and irreparably harm the retirement benefits that all railroad members worked for a lifetime to secure.

Go to this link:  smart-union.org/news/legislati ve-action-center

In solidarity,
John Risch National Legislative Director SMART Transportation Division

SMART-TD Member Survey

Dear Sisters & Brothers,

Below you will find a link to an online survey that is being conducted by DFM Research for the National Legislative Office of SMART Transportation Division. Only the final results of everyone who participated will be forwarded to the National Legislative Office (individual responses will remain 100 percent anonymous).

The survey focuses on several key issues facing our members including two-person crew legislation being considered in Congress and federal regulations affecting railroad safety.

Click HERE to take the survey.

I thank you in advance for your help.

In solidarity,
John Risch National Legislative Director SMART Transportation Division

FRA finds UP violated Hours of Service law after SMART-TD member not afforded off-duty period or interim release after “busted call”

CHICAGO (April 17)—The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) has confirmed a SMART-TD complaint that Union Pacific Railroad violated the Hours of Service law by not affording an employee a proper statutory off-duty period or a period of interim release after the railroad “busted the call” of the employee after he had departed his place of rest. FRA’s Region VI handled the investigation and will forward its findings to its Office of Chief Counsel with a recommendation for civil penalties.

In an April 5 letter to SMART-TD Illinois Legislative Director Robert W. Guy, FRA Region VI Administrator Steve Fender outlined his office’s findings that stemmed from an incident on February 4, 2017.

“On February 4,” Fender wrote, “UP crew management called SMART-TD member and ordered him to report for duty in Salem at 5:03 p.m. for a deadhead to Dexter (employees working this pool receive 3 hour call). The SMART-TD member accepted the call to report and departed his residence at 3:05 p.m.”

“At 3:57 p.m.,” Fender continued, “while in route, crew management again contacted him and this time advised that the call to report was cancelled. Upon being notified….SMART-TD member contacted crew management and requested…. 10 hours of undisturbed rest, since he had departed his place of rest.”

The request for rest was denied, and ultimately the SMART-TD member was called at 6:40 p.m. to report for duty at 9:40 p.m. to perform covered service. Having complied, the SMART-TD member worked the assignment and went off duty at 7:17 a.m. at the away from home terminal on February 5, 16 hours 12 minutes after departing his place of rest.

In closing Fender notes that “at no time between departure from his place of rest at 3:05 p.m. on February 4, and being relieved from covered service at 7:17 a.m. on February 5 did SMART-TD member receive a statutory off-duty period, or interim period of release.”

“I want to commend and thank our affected member for getting involved and getting this information to his local leaders,” said SMART-TD Illinois Legislative Director Robert W. Guy. “I also want to thank SMART-TD Local #979 Local Chairman Matt Tackett for his detailed report that surely helped FRA come to its conclusion.”

“Matt used the FRA’s Hours of Service Compliance Manual for Freight Operations to initially determine that a violation may have occurred,” Guy said. “Once I reviewed the material it was clear that something wasn’t right in what the UP did and I forwarded the information off to the FRA and asked them to investigate.”

“The process played out exactly as it should have,” Guy said. “A member questioned the railroad’s actions and got his Local leaders detailed information and in turn contacted my office where I was able to confirm, the result of which is a violation of the carrier and hopefully the education necessary to prevent this from happening again.”

Whenever SMART-TD members, either freight or passenger, have any questions or concerns regarding Hours of Service they are encouraged to contact their Local leaders as soon as possible. Also, FRA’s Hours of Service Compliance Manual’s for both freight and passenger operations are available for all members at SMART-TD’s Illinois Legislative Board website at www.illini.utu.org by clicking on “Federal Agencies”.

“I encourage all members to make themselves aware of these valuable manual’s,” Guy said. “They can help our members better understand what the carrier’s responsibility is when considering rest and hours of service and can lead, like in this example, to a violation of the carrier if they choose not to abide by the HSL.”

Thousands of Oil Train Safety Defects Across U.S.

Inspections began two years ago, after several accidents

04/05/2017
MATTHEW BROWN, Associated Press
Inspections began two years ago, after several accidents This Nov. 6, 2013 file photo shows a warning placard on a tank car carrying crude oil near a loading terminal in Trenton, N.D. Inspectors have found almost 24,000 safety defects over a two-year period along United States railroad routes used to ship volatile crude oil. Data obtained by The Associated Press shows many of the defects were similar to problems blamed in past derailments that caused massive fires or oil spills in Oregon, Virginia and Montana. (AP Photo/Matthew Brown, File)

BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) — Government inspections of railroads that haul volatile crude oil across the United States have uncovered almost 24,000 safety defects, including problems similar to those blamed in derailments that triggered massive fires or oil spills in Oregon, Virginia, Montana and elsewhere, according to data obtained by The Associated Press.

The safety defects were discovered during targeted federal inspections on almost 58,000 miles of oil train routes in 44 states. The inspection program began two years ago following a string of oil train accidents across North America, including a 2013 derailment in Lac-Megantic, Quebec, that killed 47 people.

Federal regulators said the inspections resulted in 1,118 violation recommendations, prompting railroads to become more responsive to concerns raised by track inspectors and to improve safety.

Problems identified by federal inspectors included worn rails and other equipment; bolts meant to hold tracks in place that were broken, loosened or missing; and cracks in steel bars joining sections of track. They also noted failures by railroads to quickly fix problems identified through inspections.

Such issues are not uncommon across the nation's 140,000-mile freight rail network. But they've received heightened attention after rail shipments of crude oil increased and the number of major derailments spiked following a surge in domestic energy production.

A violation recommendation occurs when an inspector finds something serious enough to warrant a potential penalty, or a railroad fails to address a defect that's been found. Federal officials declined to say how many penalties had been issued under the crude-by-rail inspection program.

A former senior official at the Federal Railroad Administration, Steven Ditmeyer, reviewed the inspection data obtained by the AP. He said it reinforces the need for railroads to stay on top of regular maintenance for their sprawling networks of track.

Many of the defects found by inspectors posed serious safety issues, Ditmeyer said, adding that it can be difficult for railroads to know when a seemingly small problem will result in a derailment.

"All of this is a call for continued vigilance," said Ditmeyer, who directed the railroad administration's Office of Research and Development for eight years. "One defect or one violation of the right kind can cause a derailment. These statistics give a good indication of the track quality, but most (defects) won't cause a derailment."

Some safety gaps found by inspectors bear similarities to the circumstances surrounding prior accidents.

In Lynchburg, Virginia, cracks in the track that went unrepaired led to a CSX Transportation oil train coming off the rails and exploding along the James River in 2014. In Culbertson, Montana, a 2015 accident that spilled 27,000 gallons of oil from a BNSF Railway train was blamed on defective or missing fasteners used to hold the tracks in place. And in Mosier, Oregon, broken rail bolts were blamed in a Union Pacific oil train derailment and fire last year.

In this May 1, 2014, file photo survey crews in boats look over tanker cars as workers remove damaged tanker cars along the tracks where several CSX tanker cars carrying crude oil derailed and caught fire along the James River near downtown Lynchburg, Va. Inspectors have found almost 24,000 safety defects over a two-year period along United States railroad routes used to ship volatile crude oil. Data obtained by The Associated Press shows many of the defects were similar to problems blamed in past derailments that caused massive fires or oil spills in Oregon, Virginia and Montana. (AP Photo/Steve Helber, File)

The rail industry views safety defects as warnings from regulators that action is necessary, said Association of American Railroads spokeswoman Jessica Kahanek. She said violations are a better indicator of safety problems because not all defects pose an immediate risk. Hundreds of the violation recommendations on oil train routes were "paperwork-related," Kahanek said, such as railroads not providing required forms to government inspectors.

Omaha, Nebraska-based Union Pacific received most of the violation recommendations issued under the targeted inspection program, with more than 800. A breakdown for violations involving other railroads was not available.

Union Pacific agreed to increase its inspection frequencies following the Mosier derailment under an agreement with federal regulators who said the railroad's inspection program was too lax.

Union Pacific spokeswoman Calli Hite said the railroad shares the Federal Railroad Administration's dedication to safety and safety compliance.

"Union Pacific has always paid close attention to track conditions and inspections," Hite said.

In this June 3, 2016, file image, from video provided by KGW-TV, smoke billows from a Union Pacific train that derailed near Mosier, Ore., in the scenic Columbia River Gorge. Oregon legislators are considering two environmentally related bills in their current session. One bill would direct the Environmental Quality Commission to adopt oil-spill prevention and emergency-response planning requirements to railroads that own or operate high hazard train routes. The other would prohibit the Legislature from funding new bulk coal or oil terminals. (KGW-TV via AP, File)

Most violations were found in the months after the inspection program began in January 2015 in the U.S. Southwest, where officials said Union Pacific runs a majority of the oil trains. In many cases, violation recommendations came after the railroad did not respond quickly enough to problems found by inspectors, said Marc Willis, a spokesman for the railroad administration.

Subsequent inspections turned up thousands of additional safety problems but far fewer recommendations for violations.

That was because the high number of violation recommendations for Union Pacific sent a message to the entire industry to quickly address any issue raised by inspectors, officials said.

"Railroads are paying closer attention," Willis said, adding that derailments have fallen 10 percent since the inspection program began. "Although many minor defects still are being identified ... both FRA and railroad inspectors are finding fewer serious conditions, resulting in significant safety improvements."

It's uncertain whether the targeted inspection program for oil trains will continue under the Trump administration, he said.

Since 2006, the United States and Canada have seen at least 27 oil train accidents involving a fire, derailment or significant fuel spill. Besides the targeted inspection program, U.S. and Canadian officials have responded with more stringent construction standards for tens of thousands of tank cars that haul oil and other flammable liquids.

The amount of oil moving by rail peaked in 2014 then dropped after crude prices collapsed. Major railroads reported moving more than 43,000 carloads of crude in the fourth quarter of 2016, down almost 50 percent from a year earlier, according to the railroad association.

Tell your Representative: OPPOSE National Right-to-Work!

Congressman Steve King (R-Iowa) recently introduced H.R. 785, the National-Right-to-Work Act, which would create a nationwide prohibition against representation fees in private sector collective bargaining agreements. This legislation is better known as Right-to-Work (for less).

Research shows that workers in Right-to-Work (for less) states have lower wages, a less secure retirement and more fatalities and injuries in the workplace; allowing some employees in a unionized workplace to pay zero in dues while receiving the same wages, benefits, and representation as their coworkers. Plain and simple, this is wrong!

While so-called Right-to-Work laws have been enacted in 27 states under the guise of economic growth, the real purpose of this dangerous law is to weaken our strength as a union. Now some anti-worker politicians in Congress want to take this bad state law, and make it national.

Please take a moment to contact your elected representatives in Congress and urge them to OPPOSE the National Right-to-Work Act (H.R. 785) by clicking the link below and sending a pre-drafted message via the SMART-TD Legislative Action Center.

Click HERE to urge your Representatives to OPPOSE H.R. 785 the “National Right-to-Work Act!

In solidarity,
John Risch National Legislative Director SMART Transportation Division